Skip to main content
· 5/3/1966

Long v. Board of Supervisors of Benton County

Citations

  • 142 N.W.2d 378
  • 258 Iowa 1278
  • 1966 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a courthouse hour provision did not violate the single-subject rule when it was added to a bill “relating to the compensation of county officers, deputies and clerks”
  • finding that a courthouse hour provision did not violate the single-subject rule when it was added to a bill “relating to the compensation of county officers, deputies and clerks”
  • finding that a courthouse hour provision did not violate the single-subject rule when it was added to a bill “relating to the compensation of county officers, deputies and clerks”
  • single-subject rule provides for an orderly legislative process and allows the legislature to better grasp and more intelligently discuss legislative proposals
  • single-subject rule provides for an orderly legislative process and allows the legislature to better grasp and more intelligently discuss legislative proposals
  • “The primary and universally-recognized purpose of the one- subject rule is to prevent ‘log-rolling’ in the enactment of laws . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.