Supreme Court of Iowa· 9/19/1990
State v. Mabry
Citations
- 460 N.W.2d 472
- 1990 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 206
- 1990 WL 136044
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding no single-subject challenge to a statute may be brought after the act is codified
- holding no single-subject challenge to a statute may be brought after the act is codified
- adopting the rule that “codification of the challenged legislation cures a constitutional defect in title or subject matter”
- noting the threefold purpose of the single-subject requirement: to prevent logrolling, to adequately inform legislators of pending legislation, and to fairly inform citizens of subjects the legislature is considering
- noting the threefold purpose of the single-subject requirement: to prevent logrolling, to adequately inform legislators of pending legislation, and to fairly inform citizens of subjects the legislature is considering
- defendant failed to challenge legislation pri- or to codification and thus any alleged constitutional defect was cured
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larson, Carter, Lavorato, Neuman, Andreasen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ReedyIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-03-29· cited 210×
- People v. CervantesIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-12-02· cited 140×
- People v. WootersIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-11-18· cited 98×
- State v. McCrightSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-10-22· cited 83×
- Godfrey v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-06-20· cited 52×
- State v. SwartzSupreme Court of Iowa· 1999-09-09· cited 52×
- Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-01-19· cited 36×
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-02-19· cited 27×
- James v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-12-20· cited 19×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-12-18· cited 12×
- Tabor v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-07-27· cited 9×
- UtiliCorp United Inc. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-11-26· cited 9×
- State v. KolbetSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-11-15· cited 9×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-31· cited 6×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1994-03-24· cited 3×
- Iowa Department of Transportation v. Iowa District Court for Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1998-11-25· cited 1×
- People v. Cervantes Dissent added February 1, 2000Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-12-02
- People v. Reedy & WilsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-01-22
- People v. DaintyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-09-22
- Gertrude K. Godfrey Vs. State Of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-06-20
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Long v. Board of Supervisors of Benton CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1966-05-03· cited 39×
- International Harvester Company v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 27×
- State v. BarrSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1975-08-22· cited 26×
- Western International & National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-11-25· cited 24×
- Peterson v. VasakNebraska Supreme Court· 1956-04-20· cited 22×
- Lapland v. StearnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1952-08-28· cited 20×
- Warnock v. FLORIDA HOTEL AND RESTAURANT COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-10-05· cited 18×
- Specht v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1964-11-16· cited 14×
- Miller v. BairSupreme Court of Iowa· 1989-08-16· cited 14×
- South Carolina Tax Commission v. York Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-09-23· cited 13×
- State v. PitetWyoming Supreme Court· 1952-04-16· cited 11×
- State v. Iowa District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa· 1987-08-19· cited 10×
- Grillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-01· cited 6×
- State v. RiceMontana Supreme Court· 1958-08-11· cited 3×
- Heaton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1939-04-06· cited 2×
- Bond v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1955-12-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.