Wilson v. Farrier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, after petitioner was paroled, his complaints regarding disciplinary sanctions such as administrative segregation became “academic” and the case was moot
• concluding informant was credible based on examination of documents in camera
• “We hold that the requirements of due process are satisfied if some evidence supports the decisions by the prison disciplinary board to revoke good time credits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).