Skip to main content

Zebroski v. State

Citations

  • 12 A.3d 1115
  • 2010 Del. LEXIS 104
  • 2010 WL 797013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Rule 61 balances the law’s interest in conviction finality “against . . . the important role of the courts in preventing injustice”
  • explaining that Rule 61 balances the law’s interest in conviction finality “against . . . the important role of the courts in preventing injustice”
  • noting that “[s]tates are divided on whether there is a postconviction right to the effective assistance of counsel under their respective rules, statutes or constitution” and collecting authorities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely, Smalls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.