Skip to main content
· 6/12/2006

Schofield v. Meders

Citations

  • 632 S.E.2d 369
  • 280 Ga. 865
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1844
  • 2006 Ga. LEXIS 392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Court “perceive[d] no reason to re-examine the issue [of proportionality]”
  • rejecting petitioner’s attempt to avoid procedural default regarding certain alleged Brady materials because prejudice not established
  • declining to re-examine proportionality on habeas corpus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.