Gibson v. Shufeldt
Citations
- 122 U.S. 27
- 7 S. Ct. 1066
- 30 L. Ed. 1083
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2086
Syllabus
<p>In a suit in equity brought in the Circuit Court by two or more persons on several and distinct demands, the defendant can appeal to this court as to those plaintiffs only to each of whom more than $5000 is decreed.</p> <p>A debtor having made an assignment of his property to a trustee to secure a preferred debt of more than $5000, other creditors filed a bill in equity in the Circuit Court against the debtor, the trustee, aDd the preferred creditor; the defendants denied the allegations of the bill, but ashed no affirmative relief; and the decree adjudged the assignment to be fraudulent and void as against the plaintiffs, and ordered the property to be distributed among them. Held, that this court had no jurisdiction of an appeal by the defendants, except as to those plaintiffs who had recovered more than $6000 each.</p>
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court· 1936-02-10· cited 923×
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court· 1897-03-22· cited 802×
- Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1995-08-29· cited 700×
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 510×
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court· 1939-04-17· cited 400×
- Troy Bank v. G. A. Whitehead & Co.Supreme Court· 1911-11-06· cited 230×
- Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court· 1895-01-07· cited 218×
- Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1941-01-13· cited 143×
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GentrySupreme Court· 1896-05-18· cited 135×
- Tom Everett v. Verizon Wireless, Inc., Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2006-08-28· cited 122×
- Ogden City v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1897-11-29· cited 106×
- Walter v. Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court· 1893-01-23· cited 101×
- Henderson v. Carbondale Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court· 1891-04-20· cited 98×
- Clay v. FieldSupreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 81×
- Robert E. Hedberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyEighth Circuit· 1965-08-30· cited 71×
- Handley v. StutzSupreme Court· 1890-12-08· cited 46×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1969-07-31· cited 43×
- Sturgeon v. Great Lakes Steel CorporationSixth Circuit· 1944-07-10· cited 36×
- Wright v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkFifth Circuit· 1927-05-11· cited 35×
- Jones v. Mutual Fidelity Co.D. Delaware· 1903-05-26· cited 29×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court· 1885-05-04· cited 127×
- Elgin v. MarshallSupreme Court· 1883-01-18· cited 124×
- Hilton v. DickinsonSupreme Court· 1883-04-02· cited 97×
- Oliver v. AlexanderSupreme Court· 1832-03-18· cited 85×
- Shields v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1855-01-23· cited 68×
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. WatermanSupreme Court· 1882-11-13· cited 45×
- Rich v. LambertSupreme Court· 1852-03-18· cited 44×
- Seaver v. BigelowsSupreme Court· 1867-04-22· cited 43×
- United States v. RepentignySupreme Court· 1867-05-18· cited 43×
- Russell v. StansellSupreme Court· 1882-03-13· cited 42×
- Hawley v. FairbanksSupreme Court· 1883-05-07· cited 38×
- Stratton v. JarvisSupreme Court· 1834-01-25· cited 36×
- The\ Nevada\Supreme Court· 1882-11-27· cited 32×
- Davies v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1884-10-27· cited 29×
- The \Connemara.\Supreme Court· 1881-01-10· cited 26×
- Ex Parte Baltimore and Ohio Rr Co.Supreme Court· 1882-10-30· cited 24×
- Freeman v. DawsonSupreme Court· 1884-01-28· cited 24×
- Paving Co. v. MulfordSupreme Court· 1879-12-15· cited 21×
- Henderson v. WadsworthSupreme Court· 1885-11-02· cited 21×
- Opelika City v. DanielSupreme Court· 1883-11-05· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.