Skip to main content
· 11/5/1883

Opelika City v. Daniel

Citations

  • 109 U.S. 108
  • 3 S. Ct. 70
  • 27 L. Ed. 873
  • 1883 U.S. LEXIS 939

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Jurisdiction-r-Pmctice.</p> <p>A brought suit against B upon bond's aggregating $34,000, on which over $5,000 interest was claimed as overdue. Before trial A, by leave of court, amended so as to include only 90 of the coupons originally sued on. He took judgment for less than $5j 000. Eeld, that the amendment was within the discretion of the Court below, and this court has no jurisdiction.</p>

Judges: Waite

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.