Hilton v. Dickinson
Citations
- 108 U.S. 165
- 2 S. Ct. 424
- 27 L. Ed. 688
- 1883 U.S. LEXIS 1020
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Jurisdiction.</p> <p>1. Cross-appeals must oe prosecuted like other appeals. When a party making • a cross-appeal fails, for a period long after the time allowed by law, to1 perfect his cross-appeal, the court, of its own motion, will dismiss it for want of prosecution.</p> <p>2. When it appears on the face of the record that the value' of the matter in dispute is not sufficient to give jurisdiction, the court will, of its own motion, dismiss an appeal.</p> <p>8. The sum demanded governs the question of jurisdiction until it appears that it is not the sum in dispute : but when it appears that the sum demanded is not the real sum in dispute, the sum shown, and not the sum demanded, will govern.</p> <p>4. On appeal by the plaintifE, or by a defendant in case set-off or counterclaim has been filed or affirmative relief is demanded, the jurisdiction is to be determined by the amount of the relief additional or otherwise sought to be obtained by the appeal, having reference to the judgment below.</p> <p>5. On appeal by defendant, the sum of the judgment against him governs the jurisdiction when no affirmative relief is asked.</p> <p>6. The amount stated.in the body of'the declaration, and not merely the damages alleged on the prayer for judgment at its conclusion, must bo considered in determining the question of jurisdiction.</p> <p>7. The previous eases bearing on this subject considered and reviewed.</p>
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court· 1932-02-15· cited 474×
- Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-01-04· cited 133×
- Gibson v. ShufeldtSupreme Court· 1887-05-23· cited 86×
- City of Houston and Houston Independent School District v. Standard-Triumph Motor Company, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1965-07-06· cited 75×
- United States v. BurchardSupreme Court· 1888-03-19· cited 59×
- Estis v. TrabueSupreme Court· 1888-11-19· cited 51×
- Block v. DarlingSupreme Court· 1891-05-11· cited 49×
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1885-12-07· cited 43×
- Hayward v. Nordberg Mfg. Co.Sixth Circuit· 1898-02-08· cited 31×
- Lilienthal v. McCormickNinth Circuit· 1902-05-05· cited 26×
- Edwin H. Helfant v. George F. Kugler, Attorney General of the State of New JerseyThird Circuit· 1974-11-18· cited 22×
- Peeler v. LathropFifth Circuit· 1891-12-07· cited 22×
- Henderson v. WadsworthSupreme Court· 1885-11-02· cited 21×
- In Re CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-08-02· cited 20×
- Bank of Arapahoe v. David Bradley & Co.Eighth Circuit· 1896-01-07· cited 20×
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. Southern Telegraph Co.Supreme Court· 1884-11-24· cited 19×
- Municipality of Rio Piedras v. Serra, Garabis & Co.First Circuit· 1932-12-17· cited 17×
- Hampton Stave Co. v. GardnerEighth Circuit· 1907-06-18· cited 17×
- Jenness v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of RomeSupreme Court· 1884-01-07· cited 15×
- Turman Oil Co. v. LathropN.D. Oklahoma· 1934-11-20· cited 15×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lee v. WatsonSupreme Court· 1864-01-25· cited 51×
- Gray v. BlanchardSupreme Court· 1878-12-23· cited 27×
- Gordon v. OgdenSupreme Court· 1830-01-29· cited 23×
- Walker v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1866-12-26· cited 23×
- Schacker v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court· 1876-11-20· cited 21×
- Tintsman v. National BankSupreme Court· 1879-11-18· cited 20×
- Knapp v. BanksSupreme Court· 1844-02-18· cited 18×
- Ryan v. BindleySupreme Court· 1864-02-18· cited 17×
- Peyton v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1824-03-12· cited 15×
- The \S. S. Osborne\Supreme Court· 1882-04-03· cited 14×
- John Smith T. v. HoneySupreme Court· 1830-03-22· cited 7×
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court· 1881-12-19· cited 5×
- Pierce v. WadeSupreme Court· 1880-03-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.