Henderson v. Wadsworth
Citations
- 115 U.S. 264
- 6 S. Ct. 40
- 29 L. Ed. 377
- 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1836
Syllabus
<p>Wbtere suit is brought against heirs to enforce their liability for the payment of a note on which their ancestor was bound, and they plead neither counter-claim nor set-off, and ask no affirmative relief, and separate judgments are rendered against each for his proportionate share, this court has jurisdiction in error only over those judgments which exceed five thousand dollars.</p> <p>Under the Civil Codo of Louisiana, a widow, even where she has accepted the succession of her husband without benefit of inventory, is not liable in solido with the surviving partners for the payment of a note made by the firm of which her husband was a member ; and payments made on the note by the surviving partners cannot be given in evidence to show interruption of prescription running in her favor.</p>
Judges: Woods
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Walter v. Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court· 1893-01-23· cited 101×
- Gibson v. ShufeldtSupreme Court· 1887-05-23· cited 86×
- Clay v. FieldSupreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 81×
- United States Ex Rel. Parco v. MorrisE.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 40×
- New York Elevated Railroad v. Fifth National BankSupreme Court· 1886-11-08· cited 13×
- Robertson v. ConwaySixth Circuit· 1911-06-06· cited 11×
- Chamberlin v. BrowningSupreme Court· 1900-05-14· cited 10×
- Feely v. BryanWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1904-04-01· cited 8×
- Wheless v. City of St. LouisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri· 1899-10-11· cited 7×
- The Joseph B. ThomasThird Circuit· 1906-11-22· cited 5×
- Freda Tinsley, Wife Of/and Jack L. Tinsley v. Packard Truck Lines, Inc. And Insurance Company of the State of PennsylvaniaFifth Circuit· 1988-06-08· cited 4×
- Fechheimer Bros. v. BarnwasserE.D. Kentucky· 1944-03-20· cited 4×
- Busey v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana· 1895-03-27· cited 4×
- Samp v. BradenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-03-10· cited 3×
- Singer v. SingerTennessee Supreme Court· 1909-12-15· cited 3×
- Decker v. WilliamsD. Alaska· 1896-03-11· cited 2×
- ABS Ins., Ltd. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.E.D. Texas· 1999-06-21· cited 1×
- Wing Hop Lee, Ltd. v. Ki Byung SooHigh Court of American Samoa· 1996-06-27
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hilton v. DickinsonSupreme Court· 1883-04-02· cited 97×
- Oliver v. AlexanderSupreme Court· 1832-03-18· cited 85×
- Shields v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1855-01-23· cited 68×
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. WatermanSupreme Court· 1882-11-13· cited 45×
- Rich v. LambertSupreme Court· 1852-03-18· cited 44×
- Seaver v. BigelowsSupreme Court· 1867-04-22· cited 43×
- Russell v. StansellSupreme Court· 1882-03-13· cited 42×
- Hawley v. FairbanksSupreme Court· 1883-05-07· cited 38×
- Davies v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1884-10-27· cited 29×
- The \Connemara.\Supreme Court· 1881-01-10· cited 26×
- Ex Parte Baltimore and Ohio Rr Co.Supreme Court· 1882-10-30· cited 24×
- Gordon v. OgdenSupreme Court· 1830-01-29· cited 23×
- Walker v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1866-12-26· cited 23×
- Paving Co. v. MulfordSupreme Court· 1879-12-15· cited 21×
- Troy v. EvansSupreme Court· 1878-03-25· cited 19×
- Knapp v. BanksSupreme Court· 1844-02-18· cited 18×
- New Jersey Zinc Co. v. TrotterSupreme Court· 1883-05-07· cited 15×
- First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. RedickSupreme Court· 1884-01-21· cited 10×
- Adams v. CrittendenSupreme Court· 1882-11-18· cited 9×
- The\ Mamie\Supreme Court· 1881-10-31· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.