Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that every plaintiff must separately satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement for jurisdiction
• holding that every plaintiff must separately satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement for jurisdiction
• finding that all federal courts may raise the issue of their subject matter jurisdiction at any time and are obliged to dismiss a proceeding sua sponte if they find such jurisdiction to be absent
• dismissing parties who failed to meet the amount-in-controversy requirement but retaining jurisdiction over the remaining party
• reaffirming the holding of Troy Bank v. G. A. Whitehead & Co., 222 U. S. 39, 40 (1911)
• reaffirming the holding of Troy Bank v. G. A. Whitehead & Co., 222 U. S. 39, 40 (1911)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).