Supreme Court· 4/17/1939
Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.
Citations
- 306 U.S. 583
- 59 S. Ct. 744
- 83 L. Ed. 1001
- 1939 U.S. LEXIS 655
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that every plaintiff must separately satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement for jurisdiction
- holding that every plaintiff must separately satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement for jurisdiction
- finding that all federal courts may raise the issue of their subject matter jurisdiction at any time and are obliged to dismiss a proceeding sua sponte if they find such jurisdiction to be absent
- dismissing parties who failed to meet the amount-in-controversy requirement but retaining jurisdiction over the remaining party
- reaffirming the holding of Troy Bank v. G. A. Whitehead & Co., 222 U. S. 39, 40 (1911)
- reaffirming the holding of Troy Bank v. G. A. Whitehead & Co., 222 U. S. 39, 40 (1911)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone, Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
301 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 2,717×
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 2,256×
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1945-01-15· cited 1,292×
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court· 1977-04-18· cited 1,211×
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 1,109×
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1973-12-17· cited 866×
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court· 1994-04-04· cited 799×
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court· 1939-04-17· cited 623×
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court· 1949-04-18· cited 560×
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court· 1942-03-02· cited 513×
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 919, Afl-Cio v. Centermark Properties Meriden Square, Inc.Second Circuit· 1994-07-12· cited 507×
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 433×
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 384×
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court· 1941-12-08· cited 372×
- Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 342×
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1954-05-03· cited 331×
- Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del.Supreme Court· 1981-03-24· cited 295×
- Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-20· cited 292×
- C. L. Whitelock v. Delbert LeathermanTenth Circuit· 1972-05-09· cited 236×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court· 1938-02-28· cited 3,971×
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court· 1884-04-21· cited 1,249×
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 931×
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court· 1936-02-10· cited 923×
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court· 1939-04-17· cited 623×
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 510×
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 480×
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court· 1929-11-25· cited 432×
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court· 1938-02-14· cited 424×
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 341×
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1914-01-19· cited 328×
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court· 1923-04-23· cited 247×
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court· 1928-05-14· cited 217×
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 187×
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court· 1929-05-20· cited 183×
- Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court· 1916-04-03· cited 182×
- Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1930-11-24· cited 164×
- Clark v. PoorSupreme Court· 1927-05-31· cited 158×
- Interstate Busses Corp. v. BlodgettSupreme Court· 1928-02-20· cited 145×
- Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of AgricultureSupreme Court· 1898-05-31· cited 138×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.