George v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court chose to decide case on its merits in the interest of judicial economy where defendant filed a timely notice of appeal but did not perfect it and later sought to file a belated notice of appeal pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moshenek v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 57×
• Atwood v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-04-30· cited 36×
• Lawrence v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-10-23· cited 3×
• Darby v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19
• Linda G. Darby v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19
• Timothy Strowmatt v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-07-15

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lee v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-10-19· cited 123×
• Collins v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-11-09· cited 114×
• Bald v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-22· cited 61×
• Games v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-20· cited 45×
• Hopkins v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-02-10· cited 30×
• Baysinger v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-06· cited 29×
• Patton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-11-22· cited 19×
• Townsend v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-03-16· cited 15×
• Beatty v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-09-26· cited 5×
• Gentry v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-08· cited 2×