Atwood v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that determination of whether defendant's prior convictions were improperly scored because they were more than ten years old appears to be the kind of matter that can be resolved by reviewing entire written record
• reversing summary denial of rule 3.800(a) motion alleging improper scoring of prior record for review of entire court record to determine if error could be resolved from the record
• “If an erroneous scoresheet calculation is apparent on the face of the record, it is reviewable under rule 3.800(a).”
• scoresheet error can be corrected under rule 3.800(a), even though the error does not appear on the face of the scoresheet, if the error can be demonstrated by the \record available in the circuit court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).