Fifth Circuit· 7/3/2003
Gentry v. Lowndes County MS
Citations
- 337 F.3d 481
- 2003 WL 21513036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a road manager was exempt, but that regardless, the defendants would have been entitled to qualified immunity because a sufficiently analogous situation had never been addressed
- considering the duty of \preparing a budget\ as one factor in finding that a county administrator may be subjected to patronage dismissal
- granting qualified immunity to newly elected county officials who terminated plaintiffs’ jobs as road manager and county administrator
- reversing a district court denial of a motion to dismiss because the Fifth Circuit found the county road manager and administer positions were not protected from patronage dismissal
- county road manager, second highest non-elected county management position, may be fired for political opposition
- qualified immunity may be warranted in “political patronage” cases where controlling authority does not settle propriety of dismissal in “sufficiently analogous” situations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Wiener, Demoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bernice Garza v. Omar Escobar, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2020-08-28· cited 57×
- Jordan v. Ector CountyFifth Circuit· 2008-02-01· cited 56×
- Mary Lou Smith Greg Smith v. Honorable Andrew N. Frye, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2007-05-18· cited 41×
- Wiggins v. Lowndes County MSFifth Circuit· 2004-03-15· cited 24×
- Jay Embry v. City of Calumet CitySeventh Circuit· 2012-11-26· cited 15×
- Maldonado v. RodriguezFifth Circuit· 2019-08-06· cited 10×
- Poindexter v. Board of County CommissionersTenth Circuit· 2008-11-26· cited 7×
- Harris v. City of Balch SpringsN.D. Texas· 2014-03-28· cited 7×
- Randleman v. JohnsonM.D. North Carolina· 2016-02-17· cited 5×
- Garza v. EscobarS.D. Texas· 2019-04-30· cited 5×
- Lloyd v. BirkmanW.D. Texas· 2015-09-02· cited 4×
- Maldonado v. RodriguezS.D. Texas· 2017-05-15· cited 1×
- Smith v. FryeFourth Circuit· 2007-05-18
- Haddock v. Tarrant CtyFifth Circuit· 2021-02-01
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 6,021×
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,562×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 4,553×
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court· 1980-03-31· cited 1,881×
- Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,236×
- Billy J. Hale v. Carl Townley, Billy J. Hale v. Carl TownleyFifth Circuit· 1995-03-23· cited 348×
- Cozzo v. Tangipahoa Parish Council-President GovernmentFifth Circuit· 2002-01-10· cited 337×
- William C. Ferguson v. Alvin I. ThomasFifth Circuit· 1970-08-13· cited 333×
- Goodson v. City of Corpus ChristiFifth Circuit· 2000-01-26· cited 269×
- Oden v. Oktibbeha County MSFifth Circuit· 2001-03-27· cited 205×
- Click v. CopelandFifth Circuit· 1992-08-27· cited 151×
- Brady v. Fort Bend CountyFifth Circuit· 1998-07-27· cited 130×
- Jimmie McBee v. Jim Hogg County, Texas and Gilbert Ybanez, Javier Alfonso Hinojosa v. Jim Hogg County, TexasFifth Circuit· 1984-04-30· cited 130×
- Benny B. Barrett, Cross-Appellant v. Carl Thomas, Sheriff, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1981-07-10· cited 112×
- Elizabeth Anna Duke v. North Texas State UniversityFifth Circuit· 1973-01-10· cited 102×
- Dr. Nolan L. Kinsey v. Salado Independent School DistrictFifth Circuit· 1992-01-03· cited 101×
- Bettye Keener Stegmaier, Etc. v. Jerry Pete Trammell, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1979-07-02· cited 87×
- Elizabeth Marshall v. Porter County Plan CommissionSeventh Circuit· 1994-09-30· cited 84×
- Chiu v. Plano Independent School DistrictFifth Circuit· 2001-07-24· cited 83×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.