Skip to main content
· 3/23/1995

Billy J. Hale v. Carl Townley, Billy J. Hale v. Carl Townley

Citations

  • 45 F.3d 914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that bystander liability under § 1983 may be imposed on \an officer who is present at the scene and does not take reasonable measures to protect a suspect from another officer's [constitutional violations]\
  • holding that allegations of an officer standing by while laughing and shouting encouragement watching another officer use excessive force on a citizen was sufficient to survive summary judgment on a claim of bystander liability
  • stating that bleeding and swelling have been deemed significant injuries when intentionally inflicted in an unprovoked and vindictive attack
  • stating that bleeding and swelling have been deemed significant injuries when intentionally inflicted in an unprovoked and vindictive attack
  • stating that bleeding and swelling have been deemed significant injuries when intentionally inflicted in an unprovoked and vindictive attack
  • stating that bleeding and swelling have been deemed significant injuries when intentionally inflicted in an unprovoked and vindictive attack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Davis, Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.