Chiu v. Plano Independent School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court did not need to determine the nature of a forum for adult speech outside of the school day, because of the “well-settled” prohibition on viewpoint discrimination “in any forum”
• holding that the Court did not need to determine the nature of a forum for adult speech outside of the school day, because of the “well-settled” prohibition on viewpoint discrimination “in any forum”
• holding that the Court did not need to determine the nature of a forum for adult speech outside of the school day, because of the “well-settled” prohibition on viewpoint discrimination “in any forum”
• noting that “designated public forum” and “limited public forum” are terms “not synonymous and should not be used interchangeably”
• finding that a genuine issue of material fact existed as to school officials’ motivation for banning the plaintiff from distributing pamphlet materials
• opining that there is disagreement over the meaning of “designated public forum” and “limited public forum,” that there is often “confusion” over their application, and affirming that “nonpublic” and “private” are technically—somehow— opposites

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).