Fifth Circuit· 3/15/2004
Wiggins v. Lowndes County MS
Citations
- 363 F.3d 387
- 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 15
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4834
- 2004 WL 502021
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that while policymaker and confidential employee are not strictly applied, the Fifth Circuit \more readily find that the government's interests outweigh the employee's interests where the employee is a policymaker or is confidential.\
- addressing together whether the employee was a policymaker or in a confidential role and finding that he was neither
- distinguishing employees in Gentry and Kinsey from lower-level employees whose sabotage of their own work would merely render their work deficient, not advance or undermine policy to the requisite degree
- “Political speech regarding a public election lies at the core of matters of public concern protected by the First Amendment.”
- patronage dismissal may survive First Amendment challenge when “political allegiance ‘is an appropriate requirement for the effective performance of the public office involved’”
- county road foreman simply implements policy and may not be terminated for political reasons
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reavley, Higginbotham, Benavides
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bernice Garza v. Omar Escobar, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2020-08-28· cited 57×
- Jordan v. Ector CountyFifth Circuit· 2008-02-01· cited 56×
- Thorsen v. County of NassauE.D. New York· 2010-06-30· cited 20×
- Lamon Griggs v. Chickasaw County, MississippiFifth Circuit· 2019-07-18· cited 15×
- Maldonado v. RodriguezFifth Circuit· 2019-08-06· cited 10×
- Poindexter v. Board of County CommissionersTenth Circuit· 2008-11-26· cited 7×
- Harris v. City of Balch SpringsN.D. Texas· 2014-03-28· cited 7×
- Garza v. EscobarS.D. Texas· 2019-04-30· cited 5×
- Montgomery v. MississippiS.D. Mississippi· 2007-07-06· cited 4×
- Garza v. Starr Cnty.S.D. Texas· 2018-02-28· cited 4×
- Burge v. Pearl River County, MississippiFifth Circuit· 2004-07-15· cited 2×
- Maldonado v. RodriguezS.D. Texas· 2017-05-15· cited 1×
- Lamon Griggs v. Chickasaw County, MississippiFifth Circuit· 2019-07-25
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 6,021×
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,562×
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 4,553×
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court· 1980-03-31· cited 1,881×
- Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,236×
- Maureen E. Coughlin and Frank S. Mistretta v. Harry Lee A/K/A Jefferson Parish SheriffFifth Circuit· 1991-11-12· cited 182×
- Brady v. Fort Bend CountyFifth Circuit· 1998-07-27· cited 130×
- Benny B. Barrett, Cross-Appellant v. Carl Thomas, Sheriff, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1981-07-10· cited 112×
- Dr. Nolan L. Kinsey v. Salado Independent School DistrictFifth Circuit· 1992-01-03· cited 101×
- Bettye Keener Stegmaier, Etc. v. Jerry Pete Trammell, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1979-07-02· cited 87×
- Nichols v. Tri-State Brick and Tile Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1992-11-12· cited 59×
- Hoard v. SizemoreSixth Circuit· 1999-11-17· cited 59×
- Aucoin v. HaneyFifth Circuit· 2002-10-01· cited 44×
- Medical Care America, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghFifth Circuit· 2003-08-05· cited 35×
- Finkel v. BrantiS.D. New York· 1978-09-29· cited 27×
- Gentry v. Lowndes County MSFifth Circuit· 2003-07-03· cited 23×
- Wagner v. HawkinsW.D. Arkansas· 1986-04-28· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.