Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2/10/1997
Gentry v. Gentry
Citations
- 938 S.W.2d 231
- 327 Ark. 266
- 1997 Ark. LEXIS 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that federal law allows social security benefits to be reached by a former spouse for alimony or child support, but not for property division
- finding a property settlement agreement, which awarded wife one-half of her husband’s future Social Security benefits as he received them, was unenforceable although voluntarily entered
- finding agreement to divide social security benefits “amounts to a transfer or assignment of future benefits prohibited by Section 407 and therefore was invalid and unenforceable when signed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-07-10· cited 33×
- Tiner v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2012-09-12· cited 28×
- In Re Marriage of HulstromAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-07-29· cited 27×
- Skelton v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-11-18· cited 25×
- Marriage Of: Donna L. Tupper (nka Hagar) v. Michael L. TupperCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-12-29· cited 25×
- Simmons v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-04-10· cited 12×
- Mulder v. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-01-28· cited 9×
- Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-09-15· cited 8×
- Houston v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-09-22· cited 5×
- Dapp v. DappCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-01· cited 4×
- Reffalt v. ReffaltCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2011-12-13· cited 3×
- Evans v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-08-31· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 411×
- Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1988-03-29· cited 128×
- United States v. Dale R. EggenSeventh Circuit· 1993-01-28· cited 83×
- Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 73×
- Matter of Marriage of Swan and SwanOregon Supreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 46×
- Kirk v. KirkSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-07-05· cited 29×
- Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-03-20· cited 15×
- Boulter v. BoulterNevada Supreme Court· 1997-01-03· cited 14×
- Bagwell v. BagwellSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-05-14· cited 13×
- Law v. LawSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1970-06-01· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.