Skip to main content

Olson v. Olson

Citations

  • 445 N.W.2d 1
  • 1989 WL 78043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Social Security is immune from adjustment by state courts in dividing marital property
  • holding that social security cannot be considered, distributed, or offset in marital property divisions
  • concluding that pension or retirement benefits accumulated during the marriage are marital property divisible at divorce
  • recognizing that “social security cannot be distributed or used as an offset in division of marital property”
  • holding the Supremacy Clause prohibits state courts from distributing Social Security benefits directly or “us[ing it] as an offset in division of marital property”
  • observing that Congress’s “retained power to alter, amend, or repeal [Social Security] benefits makes it awkward for the courts to count benefits as assets of definable value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meschke, Vande Walle, Erickstad, Levine, Gierke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.