Matter of Marriage of Swan and Swan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that family courts cannot consider the social security benefits of either spouse when dividing marital property
• holding that family courts cannot consider the social security benefits of either spouse when dividing marital property
• holding that Hisquierdo and McCarty prohibit consideration of federal benefits in equitable distribution of property
• holding that “the value of social security benefits of either spouse may not be considered in the division of property.”
• stating that “[including the value of ... social security benefits ... in a division of marital property ... is contrary to the Social Security Act”
• finding that the Social Security Act’s anti-assignment provisions prohibit a family court from considering Social Security benefits when dividing marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).