Bennett v. Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the express language of § 407 and the clear intent of Congress that Social Security benefits not be attachable”
• holding that “the express language of § 407 and the clear intent of Congress that Social Security benefits not be attachable” as reimbursement for state welfare assistance programs
• Social Security Act’s anti-alienation provision bars State’s attachment of Social Security benefits to pay costs of inmates’ incarceration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).