Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 4/10/2006
Simmons v. Simmons
Citations
- 634 S.E.2d 1
- 370 S.C. 109
- 2006 S.C. App. LEXIS 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \It is axiomatic that an order entered by a court without subject matter jurisdiction is utterly void.\
- “state courts are without power to take any action to enforce a private agreement dividing future payments of Social Security when such an agreement violates the statutory prohibition against transfer or assignment of future benefits.”
- \Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court's 'power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.'\ (quoting Watson v. Watson, 319 S.C. 92, 93, 460 S.E.2d 394, 395 (1995))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Huff, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 337×
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-07-10· cited 33×
- Dapp v. DappCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-01· cited 4×
- Reffalt v. ReffaltCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2011-12-13· cited 3×
- Katzburg v. KatzburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-07-30· cited 2×
- Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-12-02
- Williams v. JeffcoatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-07-07
- Annie L. Myers v. Town of Calhoun FallsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-07-05
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 1,508×
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 411×
- Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-22· cited 116×
- Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-03-21· cited 111×
- In Re Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 103×
- In re the Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 97×
- Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 81×
- Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 80×
- In Re the Marriage of BoyerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-09-20· cited 41×
- Kluck v. KluckNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-03-20· cited 39×
- Ellender v. SchweikerS.D. New York· 1983-11-17· cited 32×
- McDaniel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 30×
- Kirk v. KirkSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-07-05· cited 29×
- Coon v. CoonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-05-31· cited 20×
- Sherry v. SherryIdaho Court of Appeals· 1985-05-23· cited 19×
- Gentry v. GentrySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-02-10· cited 18×
- Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-07-24· cited 17×
- Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-15· cited 17×
- Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-12-16· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.