State of Minnesota v. Quentin Todd Chute

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that despite differences between FLSA collective actions and Rule 23 class actions, cross-application of legal standards is acceptable in this, the Seventh Circuit
• noting the district court found “many courts … have held that the Fair Labor Standards Act does not mandate the availability of collective action.”
• applying the same analysis to question of the availability of collective arbitration as that used for class arbitration
• “Deciding whether a contract permits class or collective arbitration involves a second . . . question of arbitrability: whether the agreement to arbitrate covers a particular controversy.”
• correcting a “mathematical error” in final award about which “the parties agree[d]”
• “Because of their distinct structure, class and collective arbitration require procedural rigor that bilateral arbitrations do not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).