Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/24/2007
State v. Davis
Citations
- 732 N.W.2d 173
- 2007 Minn. LEXIS 259
- 2007 WL 1500494
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that dog sniff outside of apartment door in common hallway is a search under the Minnesota Constitution, requiring reasonable suspicion
- concluding that the police needed reasonable, articulable suspicion to walk a narcotics-detection dog down the common hallway of an apartment building
- holding, in the absence of Supreme Court precedent, that a dog sniff in a hallway outside an apartment constitutes a search requiring a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gildea, Anderson, Paul, Meyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-03-30· cited 184×
- State v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-02-14· cited 95×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-06-06· cited 38×
- State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-11-30· cited 31×
- State of Minnesota v. David Ford McMurraySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-03-11· cited 27×
- State of Minnesota v. Corey Joel EichersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-09-10· cited 25×
- State v. BorgSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-09-21· cited 17×
- Hoop v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-07-14· cited 16×
- City of Golden Valley v. WiebesickSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-07-19· cited 16×
- McCaughtry v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 12×
- State v. EdstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-08-15· cited 11×
- State v. BaumannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-01-13· cited 9×
- State of Minnesota v. Stuart Donald LuhmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-05-31· cited 8×
- State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-02-15· cited 8×
- State v. CorreaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-09-15· cited 8×
- State v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-05-07· cited 7×
- State v. EichersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-12-02· cited 6×
- State v. EdstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-09-05· cited 2×
- State v. HollinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-10-05· cited 1×
- State of Minnesota v. Drew Douglas Wiskow DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-04-15
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-06-11· cited 1,834×
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,787×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,350×
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,253×
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1997-04-28· cited 959×
- United States v. ThomasSecond Circuit· 1985-03-11· cited 299×
- Commonwealth v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-05· cited 142×
- Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-23· cited 123×
- People v. DunnNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-11-29· cited 110×
- State v. WiegandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 104×
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-10· cited 95×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-03-11· cited 94×
- State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-01-13· cited 90×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-06-09· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.