Gardner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding courts consider \whether the exchange between the accused and the court consisted merely of pro forma answers to pro forma questions\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-07-07· cited 30×
• State v. Samuel
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-02-28· cited 20×
• Osbey v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-03-06· cited 11×
• In the Interest of Christopher H.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 3×
• Hines v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-12-01
• State v. Shanekia Garvin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2026-04-08

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Johnson v. Zerbst
  Supreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
• Peter R. Fitzpatrick v. Louie L. Wainwright
  Eleventh Circuit· 1986-11-20· cited 137×
• Prince v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-05-29· cited 39×
• Wroten v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-30· cited 30×
• State v. Ray
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 27×
• State v. Cash
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-07-30· cited 23×
• Pittman v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 17×
• State v. Dixon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-07-14· cited 17×
• Bridwell v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-06· cited 9×
• Watts v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-11-26· cited 9×