Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/28/2018
State v. Samuel
Citations
- 813 S.E.2d 487
- 422 S.C. 596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the appellate court reviews the trial court's findings of historical fact for clear error, but review of the denial of a motion to proceed pro se based on those findings of fact are reviewed de novo
- noting a defendant's request to proceed pro se must also be made knowingly and intelligently
- stating \whether a defendant is capable of effectively representing himself has no bearing upon his ability to elect self-representation\ (citing Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 400, 113 S. Ct. 2680, 2687, 125 L. Ed. 2d 321, 332-33 (1993))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 1,916×
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 1,118×
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court· 1944-05-15· cited 1,010×
- People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-08-24· cited 361×
- United States v. WestFourth Circuit· 1989-06-08· cited 223×
- Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-07-18· cited 209×
- United States v. Clinton Bernard Frazier-ElFourth Circuit· 2000-03-02· cited 198×
- United States v. Frederick Keith SingletonFourth Circuit· 1997-02-28· cited 154×
- United States v. John Vincent MacKovichTenth Circuit· 2000-04-25· cited 117×
- United States v. WilliamsSixth Circuit· 2011-05-11· cited 95×
- United States v. Albert A. LawrenceFourth Circuit· 1979-09-21· cited 92×
- United States v. Larry Lamont BushFourth Circuit· 2005-04-13· cited 85×
- United States v. Eric PowellSixth Circuit· 2017-02-06· cited 80×
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-07-27· cited 63×
- Bobby R. Savage v. Wayne Estelle, WardenNinth Circuit· 1991-02-05· cited 56×
- Hsu v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-29· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.