Gallagher v. Shelton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations related to the denial of prisoner’s grievances were insufficient to state-a cognizable due process claim
• holding that isolated acts of negligence in providing a kosher diet do not support a free-exercise claim
• holding that an allegation that a warden “rubber stamped” grievances was not enough to establish personal participation in a constitutional violation
• holding that a denial of a grievance, without more, does not establish personal participation under § 1983
• recognizing that a dismissal based on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies is ordinarily without prejudice
• holding that “denial 19 of a grievance, by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by [the] plaintiff, does not establish personal participation under § 1983”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).