Skip to main content
W.D. New York· 9/3/2013

Washington v. Afify

Citations

  • 968 F. Supp. 2d 532
  • 2013 WL 4718693
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff stated a valid claim of retaliation where “[the] defendants took specific, concrete actions against plaintiff in retaliation for his exercise of his First Amendment rights.”
  • dismissing plaintiffs equal protection claim because his allegations were more properly addressed in the context of his retaliation claims
  • dismissing First Amendment claim based on denial of three meals during Ramadan as “a de minimis burden on plaintiff's exercise of his religion”
  • dismissing Free Exercise claims because the “allegations here show at most a de minimis burden on plaintiff’s exercise of his religion” (italics omitted)
  • few isolated deprivations of religiously-mandated food do not give rise to First Amendment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.