Mark Edward Lomholt, Sr. v. Captain Holder Michael Ryan, Dr. Tom Conley Jerry Burt Cornell Smith Eugene Yetmar Mary Dick John A. Thalacker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations regarding actions of prison officials in handling prisoner’s grievances were insufficient to state a constitutional claim
• holding that a defendants’ denial of a prisoner’s grievances did not state a substantive constitutional claim
• concluding that defendants’ denial of plaintiff’s grievances did not state a substantive constitutional claim
• noting that there is no constitutional claim for denial of a grievance
• agreeing with district court that “defendants’ denial of [plaintiff’s] grievances did not state a substantive constitutional claim”
• agreeing with district court that “defendants’ denial of [plaintiff's] grievances did not state a substantive constitutional claim’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).