Duffield v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that State defendants may incur personal liability only if they participated in the alleged constitutional violation
• holding that the interests-of-justice exception to the firm waiver rule resembles the plain-error test
• explaining that the “interests of justice” is a concept encompassing matters such as the “fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings”
• explaining that the “interests of justice” is a concept encompassing matters such as the “fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings”
• finding that appellant’s failure to file factual objections or request an extension for time prior to the deadline expiring resulted in the fault resting on him alone
• listing factors to apply in determining whether the interests of justice require an exception to the waiver rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).