Colvin v. Caruso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that isolated incidents of negligence by prison officials in implementing kosher food requirements is not actionable under the First Amendment
• holding that negligence by prison officials in implementing kosher-food requirements is not actionable under the First Amendment
• holding that prison administrators must provide an adequate diet that is “sufficient to sustain the prisoner in good health”
• holding that isolated incidents of negligence by prison officials in implementing kosher food requirements is not actionable under the First Amendment
• holding that inmate’s RLUIPA claims and other claims for injunctive relief were moot because he had been transferred to a different facility
• holding that isolated incidents of negligence by prison officials in implementing kosher food requirements is not actionable under the First Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).