Casman v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• CFC had jurisdiction notwithstanding common facts in district court suit because the plaintiff sought different relief in each forum
• CFC had jurisdiction notwithstanding common facts in district court suit be cause the plaintiff sought different relief in each forum
• district court action for injunctive relief and Court of Claims action for back pay held to be “entirely different claims”
• equitable relief sought in district court did not deprive Court of Claims of jurisdiction over money claim
• Court of Claims heard case presently pending in district court because relief sought in each court was “entirely different”
• claim for backpay “entirely different” from claim for reinstatement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Casman v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Casman v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1958-07-16· cited 11×