Court of Claims· 7/12/1956
Casman v. United States
Citations
- 135 Ct. Cl. 647
- 1956 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 179
- 1956 WL 59091
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- CFC had jurisdiction notwithstanding common facts in district court suit because the plaintiff sought different relief in each forum
- CFC had jurisdiction notwithstanding common facts in district court suit be cause the plaintiff sought different relief in each forum
- district court action for injunctive relief and Court of Claims action for back pay held to be “entirely different claims”
- equitable relief sought in district court did not deprive Court of Claims of jurisdiction over money claim
- Court of Claims heard case presently pending in district court because relief sought in each court was “entirely different”
- claim for backpay “entirely different” from claim for reinstatement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Laeamoke, Littleton, Madden, Whitaker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 894×
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court· 2011-04-26· cited 388×
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1994-09-29· cited 351×
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1988-08-25· cited 190×
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc., and Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1992-04-23· cited 127×
- Froudi v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1991-01-14· cited 80×
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1966-04-15· cited 47×
- Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1971-10-15· cited 36×
- Tohono O'Odham Nation v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2009-03-16· cited 33×
- The Boston Five Cents Savings Bank, Fsb v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1989-03-27· cited 32×
- Tohono O'Odham Nation v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-12-19· cited 29×
- Hardwick Brothers Company II v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1995-12-26· cited 28×
- Royce Ainsworth v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1968-07-17· cited 27×
- Dico, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1995-02-24· cited 26×
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc. And Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1990-07-30· cited 25×
- Allison v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1971-10-15· cited 23×
- A.C. Seeman, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1984-06-27· cited 22×
- Ak-Chin Indian Community v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-01-25· cited 20×
- Hill v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1985-06-27· cited 19×
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-10-10· cited 18×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-01-04· cited 133×
- Frantz Equipment Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1951-07-09· cited 35×
- National Cored Forgings Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1955-06-07· cited 27×
- Wessel, Duval & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1954-10-05· cited 20×
- Gaines v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1955-06-07· cited 17×
Other cases named Casman v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.