Skip to main content
Court of Claims· 7/12/1956

Casman v. United States

Citations

  • 135 Ct. Cl. 647
  • 1956 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 179
  • 1956 WL 59091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • CFC had jurisdiction notwithstanding common facts in district court suit because the plaintiff sought different relief in each forum
  • CFC had jurisdiction notwithstanding common facts in district court suit be cause the plaintiff sought different relief in each forum
  • district court action for injunctive relief and Court of Claims action for back pay held to be “entirely different claims”
  • equitable relief sought in district court did not deprive Court of Claims of jurisdiction over money claim
  • Court of Claims heard case presently pending in district court because relief sought in each court was “entirely different”
  • claim for backpay “entirely different” from claim for reinstatement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Laeamoke, Littleton, Madden, Whitaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Casman v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.