Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiffs may not “recover damages for unauthorized acts of government officials” in this court
• stating that plaintiffs may not “recover damages for unauthorized acts of government officials” in the Court of Federal Claims
• stating that a “Tucker Act suit in the Claims Court is not . . . available to recover damages for unauthorized acts of government officials”
• Noting that the proper way to challenge a government decision is under the Administrative Procedure Act, and concluding, “[t]he Tucker Act suit in the Claims Court is not ... available to recover damages for unauthorized acts of government officials.”
• reversing the trial court’s finding that denial of permit constituted an uncompensated taking because the court failed to consider the property’s fair market value after regulation
• reversing the trial court's finding that denial of permit constituted an uncompen- sated taking because the court failed to consider the proper- ty's fair market value after regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).