Friedel v. OSUNKOYA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pharmacologist could not offer standard of care opinion regarding physician because construction of 18 Del. C. §§ 6853-54 requires experts be within similar field of medicine and receive same training
• holding that pharmacologist could not offer standard of care opinion regarding physician because construction of 18 Del. C. §§ 6853-54 requires experts be within similar field of medicine and receive same training
• providing that the defendant’s expert could challenge the plaintiff’s expert’s causation opinion even though the defendant’s expert did not assert an alternative causation theory to a reasonable degree of medical probability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).