Skip to main content
· 1/12/2001

Green v. Weiner

Citations

  • 766 A.2d 492
  • 2001 Del. LEXIS 10
  • 2001 WL 58444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the plaintiff “must produce expert medical testimony that specifies (1) the applicable standard of care, (2) the alleged deviation from that standard, and (3) the causal link between the deviation and the alleged injury[]” to survive a motion for summary judgment
  • allegation of malpractice stemmed from removal of catheter from patient’s vein during surgery. There was no allegation the Defendant did this intentionally to cause harm to the Plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.