Lundgren v. Eustermann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a proposed witness lacked the requisite practical experience because he admitted that he had never prescribed the drug at issue and did “not know how physicians themselves customarily use[d] [the drug] in treatment of their patients”
• stating that a district court in deciding a summary-judgment motion “may consider oral testimony ... and any other material that would be admissible in evidence or otherwise usable at trial.”
• No Tenn. R.App. P. 11 application filed
• No Tenn. R.App. P. 11 application filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).