Skip to main content
· 8/16/2002

Corbitt v. Tatagari

Citations

  • 804 A.2d 1057
  • 2002 Del. LEXIS 501
  • 2002 WL 1920037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the focus is on whether the instruction “enabled the jury to perform its duty”
  • \[J]ury instructions must give a correct statement of the substance of the law and must be 'reasonably informative and not misleading.' \ (quoting Cabrera v. State , 747 A.2d 543 , 544 (Del. 2000) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Chief Justice, Walsh, Holland, Berger, and Steele, Justices, Constituting the Court en Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.