Fifth Circuit· 5/22/1998

Huckabay v. Moore

Citations

142 F.3d 233
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10318
77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 172
1998 WL 260979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that touchstone in determining whether one act is part of continuing violation is whether employee was put on notice that his rights had been violated
holding that discrete actions are not entitled to the shelter of the continuing violation doctrine
holding that continuing violation doctrine may only apply to hostile environment claim, rather than “specific instances of demotion and failure to promote”
holding that only employers are liable for unlawful conduct under Title VII
holding that touchstone in determining whether one act is part of continuing violation is whether employee was put on notice that his rights had been violated
concluding that plaintiff’s demotion was a discrete event that should have put defendant on notice that his cause of action had accrued and that his demotion could not constitute a continuing violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Smith, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

124 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.