· 5/22/1998
Huckabay v. Moore
Citations
- 142 F.3d 233
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10318
- 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 172
- 1998 WL 260979
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that touchstone in determining whether one act is part of continuing violation is whether employee was put on notice that his rights had been violated
- holding that discrete actions are not entitled to the shelter of the continuing violation doctrine
- holding that continuing violation doctrine may only apply to hostile environment claim, rather than “specific instances of demotion and failure to promote”
- holding that only employers are liable for unlawful conduct under Title VII
- holding that touchstone in determining whether one act is part of continuing violation is whether employee was put on notice that his rights had been violated
- concluding that plaintiff’s demotion was a discrete event that should have put defendant on notice that his cause of action had accrued and that his demotion could not constitute a continuing violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Smith, Duhé
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.