Skip to main content
· 5/22/1998

Huckabay v. Moore

Citations

  • 142 F.3d 233
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10318
  • 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 172
  • 1998 WL 260979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that touchstone in determining whether one act is part of continuing violation is whether employee was put on notice that his rights had been violated
  • holding that discrete actions are not entitled to the shelter of the continuing violation doctrine
  • holding that continuing violation doctrine may only apply to hostile environment claim, rather than “specific instances of demotion and failure to promote”
  • holding that only employers are liable for unlawful conduct under Title VII
  • holding that touchstone in determining whether one act is part of continuing violation is whether employee was put on notice that his rights had been violated
  • concluding that plaintiff’s demotion was a discrete event that should have put defendant on notice that his cause of action had accrued and that his demotion could not constitute a continuing violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Smith, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.