Forszt v. Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a superior court’s ruling if it is correct for any reason supported by the record
• “[I]n determining whether the presumption [has been] restored, we ... focus on whether the underlying event relevant to assuring the validity of the signatures occurred.”
• “We may affirm the trial court’s ruling if it is correct for any reason apparent in the record.”
• “We may affirm the trial court’s ruling if it is correct for any reason apparent in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).