· 3/12/2015
Debra Arrett and Shirley Lamonna v. Julie K. Bower
Citations
- 237 Ariz. 74
- 345 P.3d 129
- 708 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 36
- 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a petition serial number requirement was “critical” to ensuring the integrity of the referendum process
- concluding that a petition serial number requirement was \critical\ to ensuring the integrity of the referendum process
- invalidating a referendum when the proponents put the ordinance number in the field designated for the serial number because compliance would not “unnecessarily burden[ed]” the proponents
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eckerstrom, Espinosa, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.