Skip to main content
· 3/12/2015

Debra Arrett and Shirley Lamonna v. Julie K. Bower

Citations

  • 237 Ariz. 74
  • 345 P.3d 129
  • 708 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 36
  • 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a petition serial number requirement was “critical” to ensuring the integrity of the referendum process
  • concluding that a petition serial number requirement was \critical\ to ensuring the integrity of the referendum process
  • invalidating a referendum when the proponents put the ordinance number in the field designated for the serial number because compliance would not “unnecessarily burden[ed]” the proponents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eckerstrom, Espinosa, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.