Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that establishment of court of appeals generally understood impliedly to amend statutory grants of jurisdiction to supreme court
• noting importance of establishing, when possible, “a bright-line rule easily ascertainable by all interested parties” for referendum petitions
• referendum challenged on ground proponents misidentified relevant legislative action in context of complex county rules for approval and adoption of ordinance
• “legislative review by the people [is] an action that the Arizona Constitution and statutes strongly encourage”
• referendum challenged on ground proponents misidentified relevant legislative action in context of complex county rules for approval and adoption of ordinance
• “Absent constitutional or statutory proscription of such surplusage, we choose not to silence the voice of the people because of it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).