Skip to main content
· 12/10/1998

Open Primary Elections Now v. Bayless

Citations

  • 969 P.2d 649
  • 193 Ariz. 43
  • 284 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
  • 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of promissory estoppel argument because “[e]ven under the facts as alleged by appellants [the government officials] never reduced the alleged agreement to writing, and no degree of formality characterized the purported agreement”
  • affirming dismissal of promissory estoppel argument because “[e]ven under the facts as alleged by appellants [the government officials] never reduced the alleged agreement to writing, and no degree of formality characterized the purported agreement”
  • “Because election contests are statutory proceedings, we evaluate appellants’ argument by considering the applicable statutory scheme. We resolve questions of law involving statutory construction de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Jones, Martone, McGREGOR, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.