· 12/10/1998
Open Primary Elections Now v. Bayless
Citations
- 969 P.2d 649
- 193 Ariz. 43
- 284 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
- 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming dismissal of promissory estoppel argument because “[e]ven under the facts as alleged by appellants [the government officials] never reduced the alleged agreement to writing, and no degree of formality characterized the purported agreement”
- affirming dismissal of promissory estoppel argument because “[e]ven under the facts as alleged by appellants [the government officials] never reduced the alleged agreement to writing, and no degree of formality characterized the purported agreement”
- “Because election contests are statutory proceedings, we evaluate appellants’ argument by considering the applicable statutory scheme. We resolve questions of law involving statutory construction de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Jones, Martone, McGREGOR, Zlaket
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.