Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that defect in affidavit attached to referendum petition did not render signatures null and void and that presumption of validity could be restored with proper showing
• holding referendum petitions invalid because they did not comply with constitutional and statutory requirements for circulators' statements
• holding referendum petitions invalid because they did not comply with constitutional and statutory requirements for circulators’ statements
• acknowledging that defect in affidavit attached to referendum petition did not render signatures null and void and that presumption of validity could be restored with proper showing
• interpreting Direct Sellers as holding that “the defect in the circulator’s affidavit ... only destroyed the presumption of validity of the signatures”
• interpreting Direct Sellers as holding that “the defect in the circulator’s affidavit . . . only destroyed the presumption of validity of the signatures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).