Skip to main content

Blackman v. State

Citations

  • 414 S.W.3d 757
  • 2013 WL 6480037
  • 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prosecutor’s race-neutral reason can be genuine, even if premised on a mistake
  • stating that opponent of strike bears burden to establish that strike was product of purposeful discrimination by preponderance of evidence
  • stating that when a race neutral explanation is proffered, the defendant has the burden of persuasion to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the State engaged in purposeful discrimination
  • stating that appellate courts “examine a trial court’s conclusion that a racially neutral explanation is genuine, not a pretext, with great deference, reversing only when' that conclusion is, in view of the record as a whole, clearly erroneous”
  • premising explanation on mistaken recollection of juror’s answer is not evidence of pretext
  • articulating three steps and noting opponent of strike has “burden of persuasion to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the strike was indeed the product of purposeful discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Alcala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.