Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/24/1995
Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, Inc.
Citations
- 337 Md. 441
- 654 A.2d 449
- 1995 Md. LEXIS 24
- 17 OSHC (BNA) 1099
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an agency’s expertise in its own field should be respected
- \We do not second guess the judgmental basis upon which the agency chose to weigh the conflicting evidence.\
- “We do not second guess the judgmental basis upon which the agency chose to weigh the conflicting evidence.”
- “Agency regulations must be consistent with the letter and the spirit of the law under which the agency acts.”
- “Agency regulations must be consistent with the letter and the spirit of the law under which the agency acts.”
- “Promulgation of new regulations by agencies is one of these so-called quasi-legislative activities.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-12· cited 227×
- Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-10· cited 156×
- Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-14· cited 140×
- Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-08· cited 104×
- Spencer v. Maryland State Board of PharmacyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-03-11· cited 86×
- Marzullo v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-12· cited 85×
- Frey v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-29· cited 76×
- J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-03-05· cited 68×
- Taylor v. Harford County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-09· cited 67×
- Charles County Department of Social Services v. VannCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-29· cited 59×
- LeJeune v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-05-13· cited 59×
- Smack v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-18· cited 56×
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-01-12· cited 52×
- Kane v. Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-12· cited 47×
- Adventist Health Care Inc. v. Maryland Health Care CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-12· cited 47×
- Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Downey Communications, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-26· cited 40×
- Aviation West Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-08· cited 40×
- DLH, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-07-18· cited 36×
- Board of Liquor License Commissioners v. Hollywood Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-13· cited 35×
- State Commission on Human Relations v. Talbot County Detention CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-07-23· cited 35×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court· 1977-04-20· cited 1,253×
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 1,191×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 433×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 408×
- Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 396×
- Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1980-06-16· cited 182×
- Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-03-19· cited 161×
- Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-01· cited 160×
- Christ v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-14· cited 114×
- Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-15· cited 105×
- Department of Transportation v. ArmacostCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-01· cited 96×
- Ad + Soil, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-26· cited 89×
- CBS Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-06-25· cited 85×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-23· cited 80×
- Tidewater/Havre De Grace, Inc. v. Mayor of Havre De GraceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-09· cited 75×
- Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-21· cited 72×
- Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n v. Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-07-18· cited 60×
- Allied Vending, Inc. v. City of BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-10-29· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.