Adventist Health Care Inc. v. Maryland Health Care Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the authority of administrative agencies to “ ‘promulgate legislative-type rules or regulations in order to implement [a] statute. Such rules or regulations will often, of necessity, embody significant discretionary policy determinations.’ ”
• \Judicial review of the decision of an administrative agency rendered in a quasi-judicial proceeding is quite narrow.\
• “Judicial review of the decision of an administrative agency rendered in a quasi-judicial proceeding is quite narrow.”
• courts show great deference to interpretation of statute or regulation by agency charged with its administration
• “Administrative agencies possess an ‘expertise’ and, thus, have a greater ability to evaluate and determine the matters and issues that regularly arise, or can be expected to be presented, in the field in which they operate or in connection with the statute that they administer.”
• “Administrative agencies possess an ‘expertise’ and, thus, have a greater ability to evaluate and determine the matters and issues that regularly arise, or can be expected to be presented, in the field in which they operate or in connection with the statute that they administer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).