LeJeune v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that doctrine would compromise state policy in favor of employee mobility
• holding, under the MUTSA, that transferring files to a personal computer for future personal use is misappropriation
• holding, under the MUTSA, that transferring files to a personal computer for future personal use is misappropriation
• declining to apply the inevitable disclosure doctrine, finding the California court’s reasoning “persuasive, especially as applied to the circumstances in the case before [the court].”
• deeming pricing information that disclosed an employer’s manufacturing costs and profit margins trade secret because of the “unique, competitive nature of the currency acceptor industry”
• deeming pricing information that disclosed an employer's manufacturing costs and profit margins a trade secret because of the “unique, competitive nature of the currency acceptor industry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).