Charles County Department of Social Services v. Vann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a condominium is substantially completed is a mixed question of law and fact subject to substantial evidence review
• stating that a court gives deference to an agency’s legal interpretation of its own statute or regulations
• stating that a court gives deference to an agency’s legal interpretation of its own statute or regulations
• stating that \[d]eferential review over mixed questions of law and fact is appropriate in order for the agency to fulfill its mandate and exercise its expertise\
• noting that when an agency decision under judicial review involves a mixed question of fact and law, the reviewing court applies the same standard of review it would apply to the review of an agency factual finding
• noting that this Court “reevaluate[s] the decision of the agency under the same statutory standards as would the circuit court, and we do not employ those standards to reevaluate the decision of the circuit or intermediate appellate court” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).