Maryland Aviation Administration v. Noland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘[A]n administrative agency’s interpretation and application of the statute which the agency administers should ordinarily be given considerable weight by reviewing courts.’ ”
• given the presumption of validity of an agency decision, the burden in a judicial review action is upon the party challenging the agency action
• “[A] court may not substitute its exercise of discretion for that exercised by the Executive Branch agency or official.”
• “[An] agency’s interpretations and applications of statutory or regulatory provisions which the agency administers should ordinarily be given considerable weight by reviewing courts.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• \[An] agency's interpretations and applications of statutory or regulatory provisions which the agency administers should ordinarily be given considerable weight by reviewing courts.\ (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• “When a statutory provision is entirely clear, with no ambiguity whatsoever, administrative constructions, no matter how well entrenched, are not given weight.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).