Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 2/23/2010

Florida v. Powell

Citations

  • 559 U.S. 50
  • 130 S. Ct. 1195
  • 175 L. Ed. 2d 1009
  • 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that warnings “reasonably conveyed” defendant’s right to have an attorney present at all times
  • concluding that, “[i]n combination, the two warnings reasonably conveyed Powell’s right to have an attorney present, not only at the outset of the interrogation, but at all times”
  • noting that, although the four warnings Miranda requires are invariable, the Court has never dictated the words in which the essential information must be conveyed
  • stating that the “Court has not dictated the words in which the essential information [of Miranda] must be conveyed”
  • noting that “[t]he four warnings Miranda requires are invariable, but this Court has not dictated the words in which the essential information must be conveyed”
  • noting that the “Court has not dictated the words in which the essential information must be conveyed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Auto, Sotomayor, Breyer, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.