United States v. Clenney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Miranda does not require that the police inform the suspect of the charges against him
• concluding that obtaining basic subscriber information, such as the name and address of the customer and cell phone call logs, does not require a search warrant
• finding that merely identifying factual omissions from a warrant affidavit is not sufficient
• explaining that Miranda 7 A copy of the Arrest Warrant is located at pages 10–11 of ECF No. 1-1, using the pagination provided in CM/ECF. “requires four warnings before law enforcement officers commence a custodial interrogation” (emphasis added)
• investigator “confirmed through phone records that [defendant’s] phone number was the source of outgoing calls”
• investigator “confirmed through phone records that [defendant’s] phone number was the source of outgoing calls”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).